Blog

Ethan Rutherford | The Peripatetic Coffin

Wednesday, May 15, 2013
Brian Gebhart

The Peripatetic Coffin opens with the title story, and we soon learn that this odd moniker refers to the H.L. Hunley, “the first underwater vessel commissioned for combat by the Confederate States of America.” One of the vessel’s crewmembers narrates the story, and he leaves little doubt about the Hunley’s likely fate: “Every day we board a contraption that has killed thirteen men, including its inventor, on test runs alone.” This proto-submarine may be peripatetic—at least while the men inside can draw breath to crank its propeller—but it’s still a coffin. 

Doomed voyages form a common thread in Ethan Rutherford’s debut short story collection, though they don’t always take place at sea. Rutherford portrays human folly and desperation across a wide range of characters and settings. Even more impressively, he employs a number of different narrative styles. But whether it’s the historical sea tales of the title story and “The Saint Anna,” the gritty realism of “John, for Christmas” and “The Broken Group,” the high satire of “Camp Winnesaka,” or the dreamlike foreboding of “Summer Boys” and “A Mugging,” Rutherford consistently bores deep into the psyche of his characters, seeking the essential loneliness at the heart of the human condition.

Perhaps my favorite story in the collection is “Dirwhals!,” which wrestles with these themes in a futuristic dystopia where a ship’s crew hunts sand worms across a great desert that was once the Gulf of Mexico (sort of like Melville by way of Frank Herbert). In one haunting passage, the narrator describes his surroundings in terms that could represent the emotional and psychological atmosphere throughout much of the book: “no perceivable seasons, weather that drives you into yourself, the illusion of unlimited space, shifting loyalties, petty grievances that burrow and sprout unexpectedly into meadows of resentment.”

No empathetic reader would blame any of Rutherford’s characters if they just gave up, accepted their seemingly inevitable fate, sat down and refused to move, come what may. They’re often trapped in situations they don’t control. Their leaders are feckless and irresponsible when they aren’t outright hostile. The threat of violence hangs perpetually in the air, and when it appears there is often no apparent rhyme or reason. Extended periods of isolation from society breed a kind of frenzied desire for human connection, but attempts to fulfill this yearning are usually doomed to haplessness or violence, or both.

And yet, hope—or something vital and indomitable enough to be its close cousin—springs eternal. Even in the face of all evidence, Rutherford’s characters go on. Perhaps it’s just survival instinct, or perhaps they just don’t see any better options. Each character reacts to his own set of circumstances (and yes, they’re all men, or boys, or at some befuddled state between the two). The narrator of “Dirwhals!” reflects on this dilemma toward the end of his tale:

Time passes; the ship never comes in; at a certain point the ruined narrative solidifies, the hidden smallness and stupidity of your ambition presents itself in toto, and there you are: a walking avatar of foreclosed possibility. It’s a dark understanding that one day is there like a weight on your neck. But nothing is written, and there’s room for surprise. Opportunity can hulk itself from the dunes at the very moment you least expect it.

So, although the collection contains a multitude of narrative styles, it’s the seafaring stories that anchor the book to its themes. It becomes impossible to read a story like “A Mugging,” which focuses on how a marriage fractures after a couple is assaulted and robbed, without thinking of the crew of the Saint Anna, trapped aboard their ice-bound ship, unable to escape the ugliness of their own actions, the bitterness they harbor against one another. Does the adolescent confusion of “Summer Boys” produce the troubled adulthood of “John, for Christmas,” and is this what leads young men to embark on doomed voyages?

The first line of dialogue in The Peripatetic Coffin comes from one of the crewmembers of the H.L. Hunley. “Desperation breeds invention,” he says. This simple statement could serve as a motto, not only for these short stories, but perhaps for our common human plight. We all know our end is coming, though we may not know the when or the how or the why. And in this way—if you'll excuse the morbid grandiosity—our very bodies are our own personal peripatetic coffins. Maybe the wonders of human invention spring from this underlying desperation, and maybe that’s sad. But it makes for some damn good stories.

Shit We Like, 5/10

Friday, May 10, 2013


Haxan Cloak | Excavation
From the lone noose emerging from darkness on its cover to its grim electronic beats and brief, warped vocal samples, Excavation is pretty clear with its intentions. Here, Haxan Cloak (aka Bobby Krlic) has made a sonic representation of what the album’s press materials refer to as “the journey after death.” Judging from the jagged beats, dour, pulsing synths, and gently fucked ambient interludes, I’d say Krlic’s journey is a little more Inferno than Paradiso. Even the album’s closing track, “The Drop,” which introduces some vaguely hopeful synth work, feels, at best, as if its conjuring a Tron-like Purgatorio. Dour as it may be, Excavation is a riveting composition that rewards repeat listens with its attention to detail and the sense of adventure that comes with its cathartic plunge into the unknown. James Brubaker

Jason Jordan | Pestilence 
Jason Jordan’s Pestilence is an odd, charming little book comprised of six fabulist tales. While fabulism has been on the tip of a lot of folks’ tongues lately, Jordan commits to this style of storytelling in some pretty exciting and fresh ways. Whether he’s writing about a door-to-door solicitor with a “rainbow disease, or Tails, from Sonic the Hedgehog 2, facing down a massive rogue wave, Jordan’s stories maintain a strong sense of play, and nicely balance humor with the sense of discovery and awe that makes this genre so special. Of course, the real star, here, is the title story—which takes up the last third of this tiny book’s fifty-four pages—about a resident of a house full of bizarre occurrences telling a reporter about said occurrences. Ultimately, Pestilence, Jordan’s first volume for Keyhole Books, is an inviting little book (I read the whole thing cover-to-cover while waiting for an airplane) from an author whose skewed, but always humane worldview shines through every sentence. James Brubaker

Aubrey Hirsch |Why We Never Talk About Sugar  
Aubrey Hirsch’s debut collection, Why We Never Talk About Sugar, is a compelling group of stories that blends fabulism with very real, very grounded characters. My favorite story here, “The Borovsky Circus Goes to Littlefield,” tells the story of a Russian circus troupe that gets stranded in Texas after financial backers pull their funding. Narrated through the perspectives of various members of the traveling circus, the story is practically a clinic in modular story-telling, and Hirsch’s ability to build real pathos into the fragmented narrative is impressive and satisfying. Elsewhere, “Strategy #13: Journal,” one of several stories in the collections dealing failing bodies, is a gut-wrenching (but still warmly, subtly humorous) account of a young woman struggling to deal with her father’s escalating MS, and “Hydrogen Event in a Bubble Chamber,” is a charming relationship story framed through the lens of particle physics. Hirsch’s more directly fabulist pieces—including “The Disappearance of Maliseet Lake,” about a lake that disappears and its impact on the surrounding town, and the title story about women getting pregnant with things that they love, just by loving them, to name two—are fun and thought provoking and imbue the collection with a surprising sense of whimsy that balances some of the heavier moments. This balance is one of the collection’s greatest strength as Hirsch’s impressive versatility is on full display, resulting in a thoughtfully constructed, beautifully sequenced book. —James Brubaker

Nick Flynn | The Reenactments

Thursday, May 09, 2013
Sally Franson

In The Reenactments, Nick Flynn isn’t exactly breaking new ground for the memoir, at least thematically. For there is family trauma, naturally, and sprinklings of brain science and therapy sessions, and also meditations on memory and questions of selfhood and wonderings if the past is ever really past – plus genre stalwarts like addiction and suicide and chronic daddy issues. Catharsis is debated. Phantom limbs are used as metaphor. Flowers are, too.

But on the other hand, The Reenactments may be the only memoir ever written that’s essentially a reflection about the production of a film based on one of the author’s previous memoirs. (Yes, you read that right.) Yes, the majority of Flynn’s newest book is meant as a companion piece both to the (generally panned) 2012 film, Being Flynn, and Flynn’s critically acclaimed 2004 memoir, Another Bullshit Night In Suck City. Flynn knows he’s walking on dangerous ground here (“Who talks about how they are to be portrayed in the film version of their life?”), but is awareness of the potential for self-indulgence enough to stave it off?

I’m going to say no, not in this case. I’m a big fan of Flynn’s previous work, both his memoirs (the other in the triptych is called The Ticking Is the Bomb, which covers the aforementioned topics plus fatherhood and the tortures at Abu Ghraib) and his poetry, but the Nick Flynn on the page of The Reenactments seems just a shadow (caricature?) of his former self. It’s not even the fact that it’s impossible for Flynn to create a scene with Robert DeNiro (who plays Flynn’s father) while flying on the actor’s private plane without it seeming like a humble-brag. (Or, lezbehonest, just a brag.) Believe it or not, most of the scenes involving the film are surprisingly vivid. The prose aches as Flynn stands on the set, watching his “mother” (Julianne Moore) commit suicide yet again, for his grief is palpable and universal and moving. Because we’ve all been Flynn in that moment. We’re all recreating the past constantly, whether we have actors in front of us or not.

So in the end, my primary problem with The Reenactments has to do more with its formal choices than its (at times questionable) content. Another Bullshit Night was praised nine years ago for its then-innovative structure, which arranged multiple threads from Flynn’s life into small, crystalline, non-chronological vignettes. Such formalism is dime-a-dozen in MFA programs these days, yet Flynn is still praised for his structural pyrotechnics. Is The Reenactments really, as Darrin Strauss claims on the back jacket, that “formally adventurous”?

Again, I’m going to say no. This may make me sound like Phillip Lopate (“I’m old and cranky! I don’t like lyric essays!”), but I’m a little tired now of lyric writers relying too heavily on white space to convey meaning. At first fragmentary memoirists like Flynn were a breath of fresh, create-your-own-adventure air vis-à-vis their dense, overly realist contemporaries, but after a while fragmentation starts to feel like a cheap trick. For example, halfway through The Reenactments, Flynn writes, “I don’t want my father to die before we make a film about his life,” and then leaves the rest of that page nearly blank. On the following page, he concludes the chapter with only these three words: “Or do I?”

When I read that sentence, and my eyes fell into the chasm of white space that proceeded it, part of me wanted to throw the book across the room and say, For crying out loud, I don’t know, Nick. You tell me.

Because it seems to me that if Nick Flynn plans to keep writing about his life, at a certain point he’s going to have to stop relying solely on such ambiguous questions and start supplying some answers. They don’t have to be definite, or sensical – hell, they don’t even have to be true. But it’s worth a try. Something’s got to give, anyway. For now that Flynn has published three memoirs, all variations on the same events and themes, it might serve him well to consider ways of breathing new life into the now well-trod material of his autobiography.

Benjamin Lytal | A Map of Tulsa

Tuesday, April 23, 2013
Brian Gebhart

Benjamin Lytal’s debut novel opens with an epigraph from Willa Cather’s My Antonia: “Why had Coronado never gone back to Spain, to his riches and his castles and his king?” And while the Tulsa of today may seem a far cry from Coronado’s Spain, the quote is not intended ironically. Instead, the “riches” here are those of youth—romance, discovery, and a certain blithe confidence in one’s own abilities and prospects. In this sense, Tulsa is not so much a physical place as an emotional and psychological one. The map exists only in memory.

A Tulsa native, Jim Praley returns for the summer after his first year of college with the intention of immersing himself in books—he’s designed an extensive curriculum for himself, which he sees as a first step toward becoming a serious writer. He is a precocious young man, and the narrative—told in retrospect from an unknown point in the future—conveys his ambitions with a wry detachment.

Wanting was a form of virtue, especially when you wanted challenging things. That’s how my world worked. It was how I had gotten into college. What more comprehensive validation was there of a teenager’s intuitive sense of his future than the positive return he gets on a list of accomplishments mailed off to authorities on the East Coast?

In this telling, such a declaration feels both naïve and yet strangely sensible. Readers will understand Jim’s logic, while also seeing through it to what lies underneath: the casual self-assurance of an intelligent young American man. Having left Tulsa for the brighter lights of a bigger city, Jim returns to his hometown convinced of the essential justice of his own desires.

And then he meets Adrienne Booker, scion of the fictional Booker family, whose oil company, Booker Petroleum, looms large in Tulsa’s economic and social life. Like Jim, Adrienne is precocious and devoted to artistic pursuits (in her case, music and painting), but she has taken a different route to get there. A high school dropout, she spends her days working in her studio and her nights going to parties, dominating the Tulsa art scene, shrouded in an aura of glamour and mystery. Jim is entranced, and his courtship of Adrienne becomes one of those “challenging things” that he presumes he is virtuous to desire. Needless to say, he doesn’t get a lot of reading done that summer.

And while his devotion to Adrienne borders on obsession, he never quite seems to be in love with her. If anything, he loves the idea of Adrienne, or perhaps the idea of himself in relation to that idea. An older member of their social circle pinpoints this aspect of Jim’s fascination, imagining how Jim will utilize this experience later in life: “At a certain point in every relationship, you’ll roll out this thing about Tulsa and the ‘one girl who almost made you stay.’ Women will love you for it. It’ll be part of your repertoire. Your ‘Tulsa stories.’”

And here we begin to approach the novel’s central theme, and perhaps the impulse that drove Lytal to write this semi-autobiographical book in the first place. As an aspiring writer, Jim feels a deep need to place himself in the larger world, and this requires a sense of where he comes from. Tulsa is one of those cities without a pre-defined set of images and associations, so Jim has to create them. And while Lytal writes beautifully about the city—from the “urban canyon” at the city’s core to the “limp down-tempo parking lots and strip malls” that surround it—the act of creation is the central thing. For Jim, and perhaps for Lytal as well, it is only once he has imagined his hometown into being that he can truly leave it.

Ultimately, A Map of Tulsa is less an elegy for lost youth than an exploration of the ways we position ourselves in relation to our past. We all craft our own histories out of whatever raw materials are available to us, and those materials seem richer as they grow ever more distant. In this way, Lytal suggests, we are all kings in our own memories, and all of our homes are castles.

Jessica Francis Kane | This Close

Saturday, March 16, 2013
by Brian Gebhart

In This Close, her second collection of stories, Jessica Francis Kane proves herself a virtuoso of the unvoiced, a keen observer of the quieter parts of life. Instead of pushing her characters toward climactic confrontations, Kane illuminates the silent exchanges, mistaken assumptions, and unspoken resentments that guide so many of our decisions. In Kane’s stories, small gestures—a woman checking her watch, a man unfurling a newspaper, an elderly woman brushing her hand through a child’s hair—often communicate far more about her characters’ desires and fears than any of their more deliberate actions.

In “Lucky Boy,” for instance, a young man who has just moved to New York from a small college town finds a dry cleaner near his apartment. Over time, and without really intending to, he befriends the dry cleaner’s son. When he brings his fiancée to the shop one afternoon, her quick glance at her watch—perhaps an involuntary tic, perhaps a calculated movement—signals the chasm of class, race, and lifestyle that separates their worlds.

In Kane’s deft hands, these small moments grow to momentous stature, looming over her characters’ lives and delineating the boundaries between them. These details—which might seem insignificant in the hands of a less able writer—divide the struggling from the thriving, the healthy from the ill, those who have figured out how flow with life’s currents from those who seem to be constantly swimming upstream.

Upon closer inspection, of course, none of these characters are thriving unambiguously; none are perfectly healthy and normal. One of the collection’s most successful stories, “American Lawn,” addresses this question by introducing a non-American to the mix. Kirill, a native Croatian, has survived war and torture and the loss of his family. Now in the United States, he tells an acquaintance, a young woman who has just bought a home with her husband and given birth to her first child, that he’s still trying to figure out how to “win” the American Dream. The young woman, Janeen, corrects him, saying it is something to be strived for, not won. When Kirill asks what the American Dream means if not a house and a car and a baby, Janeen reveals her naïve assumptions: “They come with the striving, if you’re lucky, but it’s the trying that’s important.” Kirill tells her that she is lucky.

It is clear that Janeen is either too young or too sheltered to understand Kirill’s sense of the American Dream. But the entirety of This Close suggests that she will someday. The collection includes characters in many different stages of life, facing a wide array of problems. Kane embeds two longer narratives among the collection’s standalone stories. These narratives string together a few stories that focus on different moments in the lives of the same characters. At times, I found this structure frustrating, as it asks the reader to switch gears in the midst of the book. Just when you think the connected stories are building toward something larger, you’re thrown back into an unrelated story. Still, there is a broad sort of structure that transcends the individual characters, as the concerns of younger people early in the book give way to those of characters staring down their approaching old age.

And maybe it’s fitting that the stories in This Close don’t form a neat and tidy arc. After all, Kane’s stories are often more notable for what doesn’t happen than what does. In “Stand-In,” a man and his daughter go on vacation in Israel, leaving his clinically depressed wife behind. They hire a vivacious young woman as a guide, but, contrary to the usual logic of fiction, the relationship does not turn into an affair, even after the teenage daughter gives her tacit blessing. In situations like these, the inherent tensions do not necessarily portend any larger conflicts or dramas. Life, these stories seem to say, rarely follows the grandiose narratives of our desires and fears. Many conflicts remain unresolved because the battles are never joined. And so Kane leaves us with a collection of smaller skirmishes—tentative and partial battles, often without clear winners and losers—to try to make sense of the whole.

Shit We Like, 3/8

Friday, March 08, 2013



Grouper | The Man Who Died In His Boat
In 2008, Grouper (AKA: Liz Harris) released Dragging a Dead Deer Up a Hill, the album many consider to be her masterpiece. The material comprising Groper’s latest, The Man Who Died In His Boat, was recorded alongside the songs that became Dragging a Dead Deer. The connection between the two albums will quickly be apparent to anyone who was fans of the former, as the later album is loaded with the same style of delicately strummed folk songs with hints of vocal melody at the edge of hearing, all vaguely obscured by ambient noise. While The Man Who Died works as an effective companion to Dragging a Dead Deer, the newer album can’t quite match the weight of that 2008 classic (Man Who Died standout “Cloud in Places” for instance, feels closely related Dragging a Dead Deer’s “Heavy Water/I’d Rather Be Sleeping” but never achieves the same quiet urgency). Still, the songs compiled on The Man Who Died In His Boat make for a lovely, ethereal listen that’s easy to get lost in, even if the songs don’t quite carry the same emotional resonance as those on its sister album. –James Brubaker 

Steven Gillis | The Law of Strings and Other Stories
The Law of Strings is a weird and wonderful collection of short stories. Steven Gillis has compiled a collection that draws on the absurd—a couple whose apartment becomes overrun with dogs, a woman whose atoms expand so her bone-density weighs “several hundred times the mass of lead”—and the mundane to tell stories about characters in transition. Despite the fantastical elements running through Gillis’ collection, most of these stories are rooted in very real, very anxious explorations of sex and relationships, allowing the collection to get as weird as it wants while still providing a deep, human resonance. That resonance is further heightened by Gillis’ use of ambiguity throughout these stories; I would be lying if I said I didn’t reread some of these stories (“Exhibitions” and “The Night I Met Me” come immediately to mind) a few times trying to better grasp the desperate emotions they evoke, and better inhabit the quietly unsettled resolutions that left me with a wrenched gut, slightly off balance. –James Brubaker 

Stephanie Barber | Night Moves
Uncreative writing can be a tricky endeavor. For every imaginative and thoughtful re-purposing of a previous existing text, there seem to be a dozen ill-conceived, vaguely clever but uninspired appropriations of texts that never quite add up. Stephanie Barber’s Night Moves is the first kind of re-purposed text, the good kind. Here, Barber plays the role of curator, pulling comments from the YouTube video for Bob Seger’s “Night Moves,” with impressive results. From the inane chatter of the internet, Barber has compiled a compelling examination of how we interact with each other and ourselves through popular culture. The result is both funny and sad, as flame wars about authenticity in music and worthless declarations of which television shows brought viewers to the video are balanced with some heartbreaking and impossibly sad outbursts of nostalgia: one commenter shows up repeatedly to remember the time he practiced his “night moves” with Pam in her father’s barn. By this user’s third appearance, it becomes clear that he isn’t commenting to remember—his posts are virtual yawps into the digital ether, attempts to soothe the ache of a lost past by reclaiming that past. Generally speaking, YouTube comments are one of the lowest forms of discourse the internet has to offer; with Night Moves, Stephanie Barber draws on those comments to present a picture of our flaws and weaknesses. –James Brubaker 

Dan Magers | Partyknife

Wednesday, March 06, 2013
Kevin O'Rourke

The first time I read Dan Magers’s Partyknife, I was extremely exasperated. It reminded me why I left New York, how tiresome always trying to be hip can be, and how long Brooklyn nights filled with too much Rheingold are inevitably followed by mornings of nausea and headaches. It reminded me of the fact that, for all of its good writing, Vice magazine can come across as insufferably cooler-than-thou. To wit, one of Partyknife’s many untitled poems:

Some serious dudes place amps
in full-circle manner of Stonehenge.

The amps are the band. The dudes are the roadies.

Noise through another
all layered and decayed.

We tried to achieve hypnosis
and one of us levitated.

If you’re doing it with that girl right now
then this message means jackshit, but probably
you’re not — probably she’s like, “Where’s the beer?”
and you’re like, “I don’t got any,”

but we’ve got the beer right here.


I truly didn’t know what to make of poems like this, and this book is filled with them. I mean, it’s funny, but why write this poem? What is, ahem, its occasion? Not that every poem need contain some nugget of wisdom, but the romantic part of me would like to believe that good poems at least hint at some manner of understanding, experience, and, that dirtiest of words, beauty.

On first read, many of the poems that make up Partyknife don’t seem to hint at much. The tone of the above poem is representational of much of the book in its humor and its slightly sneering attitude; at times, the book’s speaker comes across as something of a bro. In addition, some of Partyknife’s many pop-culture references include video games (Call of Duty and Guitar Hero), Journey’s frat-rock anthem “Don’t Stop Believin’,” and a description of the drinking game Wisest Wizard: "You drink a can of Natty Ice, / then tape each one you finish to the bottom of the last." These references ground the book in a particularly young male world, in a hipster’s paradise of bands and beers and bars.

But of course Partyknife is a book of poetry, and deserves deeper consideration. Though many of the poems in Partyknife might seem, on their own, to consist of unconnected pithy observations, a sort of narrative is established through the book’s treatment of its characters. In particular, “Cecilia” is an especially important character: she is the first person we meet, a “smart person among smart people. / She’s a pulsing brain,” and there is the suggestion of a complicated unrequited love for her. The speaker also discloses more and more about himself as the book progresses. Though the poems never fully abandon their standoffish-mocking-observer tone, lines of what seem to be self-lacerating honesty, sometimes bordering on the emo, become more frequent:

  • I’m so lonely I could die. (17)
  • I don’t know how to be someone you miss. (45)
  • There are so many Wii characters of people I don’t see anymore. (84)
This last one brings up another point, that many of this book’s pop culture references are used to hint at some sense of inadequacy. For example, the context of the aforementioned Guitar Hero reference is:

I can’t be psyched to play Guitar Hero,
because it reminds me that I can’t play real guitar.


So while the speaker of Partyknife may exist in a fratty, bro-ish hipster world, he may not be fully comfortable there. Indeed, many of the poems in this book seem to have been written from the point of view of someone looking in on a group that he is not fully part of; the vague condescension for that being viewed is a mask that hides the speaker’s true feeling of being an outsider and possibly fat (“My fat is warm and surrounds me like a mother.”) and inadequate and on and on.

Maybe. As tempting as it is to read this book that sympathetically, I can’t but wonder if I’m seeing smoke where there’s no fire. Rather, another way of reading Partyknife is that just what makes the book problematic for me — its detached coolness, and some of its subjects’ banality — is the point, that this book is not interested in traditionally poetic, “Ode on a Grecian Urn” beauty. Instead, Partyknife is interested in some of poetry’s other uses: in being incisive and cutting; in dissembling and obfuscation; in being absurd for absurdity’s sake; and in a vision of the poet as a mysterious man who shows up at a party late dressed in all black, and who, aside from the occasional whispered profundity, stays mysteriously silent all night, until he leaves for another, cooler, party.

Call for Submission

Thursday, August 23, 2012



We like badass book reviews, and if you think you fall into the badass book review category, we want to see your stuff.

First, read our Guidelines. Believe it or not, we actually don't like reading and/or editing 1,500 word book reviews—save those for your intro to grad studies course. If after reading said guidelines you still think we're a match, it's time to Submit. (Make sure you select "reviews" under category type.)

Love,
The Editors


A Note on Our Book Reviews

Thursday, May 24, 2012
As you've probably noticed, we now publish book reviews in each issue. As time permits and we receive more review submissions, we will add them to our blog as well.

Here's a round-up of our latest reviews in case you missed them: 4/12 | 2/12 | 12/11.

If you would like to submit a review, please read our guidelines before submitting. For other questions, please contact us.

Review of Helen DeWitt's Lightning Rods

Thursday, January 19, 2012

Brian Gebhart 

As satire has gained popularity and gone mainstream over the past several decades, it has also lost some of its focus. The term itself is now applied to numerous comedic sub-genres, from the gently mocking spoof to the outright parody to the bitter screed. All these various forms of comedy have become central to our culture, and ironic detachment seems to be the default mood of the times. As a result, satire in the older, Swiftian sense—where the satirist proposes a pointedly absurd idea and then follows that idea to its logical, if ridiculous or horrific, conclusions—has faded.

Helen DeWitt’s Lightning Rods is a satire in the traditional sense, and its publication serves as a reminder of what satire can (and should) do. DeWitt gives us Joe, a salesman so archetypical that he has sold both encyclopedias and vacuum cleaners. But these ventures have been unsuccessful, and we find him, at the beginning of the novel, living in a trailer, spending much of his time thinking through elaborate sex fantasies. And it is here that Joe experiences his eureka moment. He is marveling at the lengths people will go to in order to obtain sex, the risks they will take, and the accompanying shame they are often compelled to feel:

Well, if people are willing to take those kinds of risks you know there’s got to be money in it…Plus, if you could give people a way to get it out of their system they would be a whole lot more productive. They’d be happier about themselves. Because there had to be a lot of guys like himself, guys who didn’t want to be spending the amount of time they were spending thinking about sex, guys who given the chance would rather get it out of their system and concentrate their energies on achieving their goals.

And so Joe finds his entrepreneurial calling as the inventor and proprietor of lightning rods: women working in elite companies who are willing, for an extra stipend, to provide sexual services to men working in the same company.

Much of the material in the book is devoted to Joe’s early difficulties in implementing his modest proposal: finding the right women for the job, pitching his service to interested companies, and modifying the bathroom facilities in his clients’ office buildings to allow for workplace sex that is safe, efficient, and anonymous—in a word, professional. Large swaths of modern life fall under DeWitt’s comic gaze: sex, work, gender relations, and our pious attitudes toward productivity, salesmanship, and sexual propriety. Throughout, Joe’s audacious practicality and his commitment to a particularly American notion of common sense are DeWitt’s best weapons, forcing her readers to examine not just the book’s purported subjects, but our attitudes about them, as well.

DeWitt’s previous novel, The Last Samurai (2000), was a sprawling tour-de-force about a mother and her genius son, incorporating numerous texts, languages, and styles into the narrative fabric. Lightning Rods, by contrast, is much more tightly wrapped, not just shorter but also more unified in focus and narrative voice. As such, it may seem like a bit of a left turn for this extremely gifted writer. But the aesthetic preoccupation of the two novels remains constant: an exploration of how we use language to represent thought, and the ways that language can, in turn, come to guide our thoughts. Joe’s homespun, common sense clichés are not just a verbal tic. He genuinely buys into them. This tendency is amusing when he’s thinking in stale bromides like, “Never marry your mistress” and “We live in a flawed world,” or folksy witticisms like, “As a salesman, he knew that if you go around with your head in the sand, sooner or later someone is going to give you a swift, hard kick in the butt.” But when a lightning rod comes to him in outrage after having been urinated on by an anonymous male coworker, and Joe’s responses include, “Remember, Suzanne, we don’t know the whole story,” and “What he wanted to say was, if you can’t stand the heat stay out of the kitchen,” we begin to glimpse the frightening emptiness at the heart of the enterprise.

For many readers, these insights will be cold compensation for the lack of traditional character development or plot structure. And it’s true that the atmosphere DeWitt evokes often resembles that of an air-conditioned conference room. As a character, Joe has all the humanity of a Men’s Wearhouse blazer with the tags still attached. Some of the minor characters are intriguing, particularly Lucille, the lightning rod who solves many of the obvious problems with Joe’s initial idea, and Ed Wilson, the most enthusiastic early adopter of the new system. But these characters are swiftly shuffled off the stage in favor of new ones that exemplify some new dilemma. The novel’s true main character is the idea itself—it guides the narrative, produces the conflict, and determines how the characters act. As I was reading, I found myself waffling between queasiness at this lack of human emotion and admiration of DeWitt’s unity of purpose. This is certainly not a book that lends itself to hot chocolate and a warm fireplace. Instead, it insists that the wintery landscape of contemporary life doesn’t just exist on the outside. It’s crept inside as well.

Back to top

© 2010 The Fiddleback All rights reserved Powered by Traffik

Level 9 Design